Henderson Kite.

Archive for January, 2010

01.28.2010

Location, Location ... app

foursquare_logo

Anyone that has kids will tell you that as soon as you find out you are expecting a baby, it suddenly seems like every other person is pushing a pram and it definitely wasn't like that the day before. I kind of feel like that with Foursquare.

A good friend flagged them up a month ago and  I thought nothing about it and then yesterday and today it seems like all I could see (no Apples for me) was Foursquare. All the circles seemed to cross.

For anyone that is yet to discover the business, it’s a location based review site? Social networking site? Game? Type thingy – it is probably best to read yourself vs my dumbed down version. The interesting thing is that it is growing like crazy and reportedly getting a person “checking in” at locations every second.  One of those was me and I think it’s rather good.

Foursquare isn’t the only game / review site. A study of the most innovative apps (which also came out yesterday) placed 4 in the top 20, with  Gowalla, Buzzd and Rummble all showing tremendous growth. For me the excitement comes from the fact that you have this amazing network affect, of people reviewing predominantly commercial premises (bars, restaurants etc). You sense a revenue model can’t be far behind.

I then read a very insightful article by Maya Baratz about how Newspapers should be engaging in the app economy (or potentially can become structural to the app economy). With a wonderful line of, “Rather than trying to control its profits by curtailing the spread of its content, the news industry should be redefining a means to fuel that profit off of such a spread”.

I then read Metro in Canada has done a deal with Foursquare. and another pram passes the window.

It feels like a good move. Helping to build The Timeout of Timeout’s and really get their audience behind it. For the technology business they potentially get additional boost of speed to market, which is so critical for technology. We all have know the paper have online audiences in their millions !

Which is where I came to my final thought. How polarised the view is between the technology market and media market when they look at their audiences.

Media loves to bag elephants. Lets be honest there was never anything sexy about classified and for most it was only ever a stage to get to the big game accounts, Execs were keen to go out entertaining and secure the big client again vs making lots of small sales. Oddly enough Google (in the technology corner) loved it the other way round and wanted the simple scalable small business and almost looked uncomfortable dealing with big accounts. No surprise that most papers were eaten from the classified end where all the “joiners” were and the rising stars were out on safari looking for the “brand” money.

There is an opportunity with businesses like Foursquare to really work with publishers and get involved with their large online audiences and brands that many readers still have affection and respect for. I think more importantly there is also a real opportunity for publishers to learn something about not “doing the deal” and getting some money out of  smaller businesses and really having to think about what people want. Heaven forbid. “Get me editorial on the phone”

01.26.2010

Is SeeSaw the final piece for UK VOD market

seesaw

SeeSaw (Previously Project Kangaroo) have announced they have bagged their first big advertisers and ready for their Feb roll out. Obviously there are still deals in the pipeline to carry the large broadcaster's content. I think the insight here is the prices and sell throughs that pre-roll are getting in long form, produced content (see previous post) and the appeal for something like SeeSaw ad it can generate them more money. If they can get it right, SeeSaw has the ability to extend the online footprint of many of the TV stations existing online audiences and that has to be appealing.

The 4OD and YouTube deal really showed the importance of this and suddenly looks as though it may crack the age old conundrum of "How will YouTube make its money". Interestingly it could end up being a similar strategy as it was for their search product. Natural being the audience driver and Adwords being the money makeing model that sits on the top.

I am sure there will be a nervousness by many of the stations to dvert attention away from their core online platform, but I think it will start to make them think about how they can extend their audiences and work together. What is the channel and what is the platform? SKY knows this only too well, with SKY homes and SKY channels. SKY on SKY, ITV on SKY, Channel 4 on SKY .... you get the picture.

SeeSaw is a platform not a content provider and operates in the commercial space - that's what's new and that is why, whichever way, things are about to change.

01.24.2010

Value of content

ny times

The NY Times announcing that it is moving to a paid for content / subscription model is a bold move and probably about time. Will it work? I have no idea. One thing it will answer is what is the value of their content and if anything start to bottom out the answer of what is the value to written content online. I used to think the old adage of "content is king" had lost its relevancy. The majority of the biggest sites in the UK don't have editors or even create so called content - application was king, relevancy was king, context was king ... content wasn't really up there.

I have changed my view. I recently spoke to a natioinal TV station who gave an insight into the usage of their video-on-demand service (super big), the sell through levels of the advertising (it was all sold) and the yields being achieved (I reckon they must have been getting yields 4 - 5 times that off your common gardenal natioinal newspaper site). The point being they were nailing it. The reason being it was great content. TV shows that people wanted to watch again. The thing that was raised eyebrows was the amount of archive footage that was generating plays and carrying these valaubale ads. From the ARCHIVE.

Janey L Robinson - Chief Executive of Ny Times, was using the iTunes micro payment model as proof that perhaps the market was ready to pay for content. I'll be honest I think this is perhaps a stretch too far. The nature of the contrent is very different, but it made me think of the archive word again.

My thinking is, would the creator of content archive it and would someone then come along and pay for that content. I think that this is  the model at the moment, in markets where it works. Music, video, financial even porn. Succesful paid for models. Perhaps they are selling the freshness of the content of the stories - but will people pay for that? Especially with the explosion of free media services, national funded broadcasters and wire services.

The saying of "Good strategy is about sacrifice" stands here. The papers really need to think about the type of content people may pay for and for now I kind of like "The Archive Test". Fingers crossed they need a break.

01.06.2010

Ramon Deleon "The pizza guy"

ramon

This speaks for itself - have just come across Ramon the "Pizza "Guy". Someone that just gets out there and does it - have a look at the write up on it that the guys at the Social Media Examiner put together and what Ramon is up to. If you can build up a big Dominoes Pizza business in Chicago ... proof good news spreads and businesses work if you can relate to them.